Relaxing Doesn't Make Babies

SA Results

October 5, 2006 — 7:25 pm

Den called his doctor to ask about his test results yet again. They called the lab. Lab had no record of him, apparently. So he told the doctor’s office that YES he was there, with the paperwork faxed from the doctor! I guess they ended up finding it, as he called back with the results. I got them faxed to me here.

Color, viscosity, liquifaction: Normal
Count: 89 million (Reference: 60-200mil)
Volume: 7.0mL (Reference: 2.0-5.0mL)
pH: 8.5 (Reference: 7.0-8.0)
Motility: 70% (Reference: 40-100%)
Forward Motion: 3 (Reference: 2-3)
Morphology: 68% (Reference: >=60%)

pH is a little high, but otherwise it is all completely NORMAL. So we keep trying, I guess. Make an RE appointment for after the 1-year mark and see what to do with me.

7 responses to “SA Results”

  1. Jess says:

    I bet the low count for the high volume (thus very diluted) has something to do with it too. And considering how sensitive womens parts are, even that much off on pH could contribute too.

    Not saying Den is broken, just, little things, when they add up, make a difference. *hugs*

  2. Nat says:

    Well 80 million is the average, so his count isn’t low. But yeah, the pH could be causing an issue – I’ll see what my obgyn has to say about the results. Maybe all that’s needed to fix it is a diet change. ;)

  3. Denise says:

    Hi :) Im from FF…
    I just wanted to say that those numbers look awesome, especially the motility!

    The volume is quite large, but I think thats a good thing :)

    Im known as narcissa_bell on FF, i hope you dont mind me commenting! Im really rooting for you!

  4. Nat says:

    Thanks Denise! I know your name on FF. Thanks for dropping in, I love to get visitors! :)

  5. Jess says:

    Yes, dear, but all my labs came up normal too – and you know how sick I was before my surgery. ;) That and I was looking at it as 60mil – 200mil, so I may have been interpreting it wrong.

    *btw, so nice to be able to note here again ;) *

  6. Nat says:

    Hehehe. And yes, that is the “normal” range… just that the upper range is pretty rare, I guess.

  7. Hoping says:

    at least you have some answers now! damn doctors.